{"id":"W2091227949","doi":"10.5539/cis.v3n2p19","title":"A Bibliometric Assessment of Canadian Software Engineering Scholars and Institutions (1996-2006)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; York University; Universities Space Research Association; St Mary's University; Concordia University; Acadia University; McMaster University; University of Windsor; University of Regina; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Victoria University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Computer science; Institution; Event (particle physics); Field (mathematics); Impact factor; Library science; Software; Bibliometrics; Political science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01088037,0.00008279032,0.0001404924,0.5534322,0.0004634957,0.003654047,0.001044498,0.00005659333,0.00003056042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01142677,0.00006243206,0.00002575788,0.6434373,0.0004386169,0.01006123,0.000504298,0.000256288,0.00001601818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004278127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001033879,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001859721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003228236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9957756,0.00001449467,0.0004705623,0.0002420515,0.003151599,0.000345626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957876,0.0006018602,0.0001351679,0.000339801,0.002457388,0.000678163],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[8.782179e-7,0.00001838416,0.430481,0.00001465521,0.000003412193,0.000001069195,0.0002441503,0.0005186998,0.0008621694,0.02976465,0.0008300635,0.5372608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001236136,0.0000375327,0.8615001,0.000004540127,8.866843e-7,0.00001654951,0.00002302697,0.09606168,0.0001190558,0.00008339212,0.04195403,0.00007557822],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9000542,0.00005868854,0.09608903,0.0002133855,0.0007384722,0.0001376951,0.00003787544,0.00001624784,0.002654466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9435876,0.0001109274,0.05611096,0.0001558032,0.00002065118,0.000002804173,0.000001935974,0.000001350674,0.000007970197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5371853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2499999798335201,"score_gpt":0.4837381573303529,"score_spread":0.2337381774968328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}