{"id":"W2091227949","doi":"10.5539/cis.v3n2p19","title":"A Bibliometric Assessment of Canadian Software Engineering Scholars and Institutions (1996-2006)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; York University; Universities Space Research Association; St Mary's University; Concordia University; Acadia University; McMaster University; University of Windsor; University of Regina; Simon Fraser University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Victoria University; University of Alberta","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Index (typography); Computer science; Institution; Event (particle physics); Field (mathematics); Impact factor; Library science; Software; Bibliometrics; Political science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005466479,0.0007139716,0.0009825166,0.09657968,0.005875986,0.006544065,0.001887505,0.0005840871,0.003137762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02873933,0.0003086222,0.0007659449,0.1749431,0.0009465502,0.001936722,0.002044289,0.0004680784,0.001018266],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08054383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1107587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9736669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802853,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850398,0.0003811881,0.0007100027,0.0005540951,0.01194806,0.001366872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438474,0.00166875,0.004912115,0.0006756423,0.04586874,0.00302748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004341929,0.0001432318,0.570078,0.003482358,0.0004397768,0.0005665628,0.007886986,0.002131687,0.001446933,0.009609663,0.114499,0.2892815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001843287,0.0000558828,0.8760782,0.0004263544,0.000172185,0.0002277092,0.004191254,0.0009526117,0.0008377825,0.0003146288,0.1166347,0.00009009454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6197851,0.04239719,0.001641033,0.007482097,0.0004912711,0.0005188377,0.1544516,0.0006700391,0.1725629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8737625,0.02797296,0.004446263,0.0004784219,0.0002474743,0.0002286265,0.06146395,0.000101551,0.03129818],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2499999798335201,"score_gpt":0.4837381573303529,"score_spread":0.2337381774968328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}