{"id":"W2091350446","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0023420","title":"On the Lack of Consensus over the Meaning of Openness: An Empirical Study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Terminology; Openness to experience; Credibility; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Public relations; Set (abstract data type); Nonprobability sampling; Process (computing); Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006656818,0.00006728937,0.0001975966,0.00008151054,0.0001272991,0.00007628879,0.001331733,0.00001411675,0.0006262435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002964348,0.00002961934,0.00003825776,0.0005168624,0.0001797466,0.00005164882,0.0004745758,0.00008190161,0.00008781774],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005364205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001892276,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001146382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007090459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972188,0.0004381698,0.0004213781,0.0003316631,0.001471485,0.0001185246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960753,0.001960668,0.0002261191,0.001502203,0.0002018633,0.00003383734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007526544,0.05368086,0.6174777,0.00003993854,0.001110023,0.00003722955,0.1277221,0.0002398654,0.002804861,0.06200027,0.1182245,0.01591011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001264391,0.002306665,0.8403898,0.0001630273,0.0002663219,0.000001138984,0.06513917,0.02332057,0.007408606,0.05893353,0.0004965902,0.0003101959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866949,0.00000583992,0.00004864348,0.0003518826,0.0000962407,0.0003069383,0.000009779584,0.00001110083,0.01247464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989597,2.985119e-7,0.0003758171,0.0001852408,0.00001613989,0.00000363293,4.808508e-7,0.000003656274,0.0004550997],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2229121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6856928,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6414299195778922,"score_gpt":0.4359662536768928,"score_spread":0.2054636659009994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}