{"id":"W2091468099","doi":"10.1115/omae2009-79448","title":"Constraint-Based Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Cylinders With Circumferential Cracks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Fatigue and fracture mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Materials science; Finite element method; Cylinder; Structural engineering; Stress intensity factor; Fracture (geology); Ultimate tensile strength; Stress (linguistics); Fracture mechanics; Failure assessment; Linear elasticity; Composite material; Mechanics; Mathematics; Geometry; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002546476,0.0002416796,0.0003354526,0.0005003297,0.0002840997,0.0002658835,0.000550735,0.0004921763,0.0008449036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009981899,0.0001858632,0.0003014412,0.0002538515,0.0003986614,0.0003894615,0.0002399352,0.0001826048,0.0001246484],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003839147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005512005,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01235006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01682573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998013,0.00001657453,0.00000820229,0.00002747432,0.0001270556,0.00001939856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994779,0.0001915767,0.00008981562,0.0000470003,0.0001777058,0.00001607085],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481603,0.00004752752,0.01197585,0.0001763368,0.00002830767,0.0006412576,0.0001513135,0.8016772,0.1480648,0.006211545,0.0003612599,0.03051636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002326571,0.0000239935,0.004190212,0.000003372818,0.000002967081,0.00009684959,0.00001452681,0.9894702,0.00547349,0.0004352164,0.0002786536,0.000008172023],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8383944,0.000323377,0.1575928,0.00004460022,0.000006796841,0.00003665958,0.0001452766,0.00008840037,0.003367688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984641,0.00009609212,0.01424864,0.00000567887,0.000002170367,0.0000249236,0.00008724665,0.00001331423,0.0008809533],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02455634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006387372298451958,"score_gpt":0.199631322120672,"score_spread":0.19324394982222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}