{"id":"W2091495431","doi":"10.1002/bimj.200290012","title":"Evaluating Normal Approximation Confidence Intervals for Measures of 2 × 2 Association with Applications to Twin Data","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometrical Journal","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre","keywords":"Statistics; Mathematics; Confidence interval; Binary data; Correlation; Coverage probability; Sample size determination; Monte Carlo method; Similarity (geometry); Population; Econometrics; Binary number; Computer science; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1093066,0.001121852,0.002401249,0.005696134,0.0007820671,0.003328153,0.004037775,0.003146478,0.002591874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4907652,0.001038768,0.001628348,0.003927856,0.004928828,0.003880563,0.004223147,0.002765562,0.0003182064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153469,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004871468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002128166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.941449,0.047912,0.00201791,0.002689141,0.005319851,0.0006120719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2767981,0.6975662,0.008091568,0.01080449,0.006035057,0.0007046051],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001067355,0.0001369854,0.0303913,0.0004946428,0.001058433,0.0006158662,0.00111223,0.7085408,0.001181614,0.1735175,0.000982235,0.08090103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008633773,0.0001515495,0.004238476,0.0001829583,0.00007708378,0.0002960474,0.000142549,0.9100925,0.0008284798,0.08304569,0.00078743,0.00007078214],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07476049,0.001385696,0.9216664,0.0002764555,0.00006134271,0.0001513343,0.0001498071,0.0004433338,0.001105067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6239014,0.0006425388,0.3735372,0.0001607411,0.0001160283,0.0005231359,0.0004656441,0.0001880095,0.0004653174],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8906934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5780754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1473028468068603,"score_gpt":0.3985875349321426,"score_spread":0.2512846881252823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}