{"id":"W2091513515","doi":"10.1080/07474930802458638","title":"A Note on Unit Root Tests with Infinite Variance Noise","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Econometric Reviews","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Unit root; Estimator; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Exploit; Delta method; Unit root test; Root (linguistics); Applied mathematics; Asymptotic analysis; Statistical hypothesis testing; Unit (ring theory); Statistics; Process (computing); Econometrics; Computer science; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03171772,0.001060008,0.002443965,0.002341869,0.0008509406,0.002296217,0.002695561,0.004267918,0.003725023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.163418,0.0006486155,0.001721666,0.003338561,0.007262431,0.008209608,0.002960211,0.01026162,0.0008756588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001351875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001255794,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002394853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001761259,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9769039,0.01552237,0.0009328523,0.002147049,0.004054979,0.000438883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7539083,0.2301517,0.002905322,0.007280935,0.005186919,0.0005668227],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006018154,0.00003554312,0.001434042,0.0002436086,0.0001048191,0.0004110644,0.0001446213,0.008457838,0.0004160196,0.9010934,0.01206795,0.07553089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004607009,0.00008751752,0.001451385,0.0002827664,0.00005961544,0.0003398394,0.00004963392,0.04244637,0.0008309452,0.9319988,0.02230847,0.00009863375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.008717826,0.01895891,0.9327201,0.01947368,0.002729789,0.00004656735,0.0001981858,0.0003714021,0.01678355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3446057,0.02326601,0.5736849,0.02063126,0.02163153,0.0003499672,0.0003806441,0.0006080206,0.01484207],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03171772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1677413,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07021251798825065,"score_gpt":0.2743069846870708,"score_spread":0.2040944666988201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}