{"id":"W2091695728","doi":"10.4141/cjps08055","title":"A study of scab resistance in 16 apple progenies using parents with partial scab resistance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Fungal Plant Pathogen Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Venturia inaequalis; Biology; Apple scab; Context (archaeology); Malus; Horticulture; Cultivar; Resistance (ecology); Mating design; Seedling; Pollen; Randomized block design; Plant disease resistance; Veterinary medicine; Botany; Agronomy; Genetics; Gene; Hybrid; Fungicide; Diallel cross; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000865291,0.000133162,0.0002884858,0.0001194763,0.0002875008,0.0001048218,0.0006613335,0.0000366883,0.00001304937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001313201,0.00005727911,0.00003598581,0.001090624,0.0002249335,0.0003767649,0.00001076201,0.0001580964,8.28368e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001783193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005479613,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00196718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5293599,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981831,0.00007445944,0.0004343732,0.0002568254,0.0005627353,0.0004885301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988921,0.00007364345,0.0003633398,0.00007637767,0.0001862969,0.0004082924],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001014881,0.0004466707,0.5522625,0.00001788594,0.00002367576,0.002028126,0.002411511,0.0004677113,0.4391826,0.0003078999,0.0004714385,0.001365038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002400521,0.003126499,0.9613764,0.001273765,0.00007413351,0.0005710243,0.008410736,0.0001973026,0.01748352,0.0003691512,0.003886587,0.0008303589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986668,0.0003660347,0.000003060963,0.0001971359,0.00008573245,0.0002718827,0.000205241,0.000003503319,0.0002006358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995793,0.000002704482,0.0002589601,0.0000514472,0.00007079123,0.000001648447,0.000003042738,7.148934e-7,0.00003136236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5273927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4792281,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02204151151176104,"score_gpt":0.2114938880844831,"score_spread":0.189452376572722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}