{"id":"W2091709843","doi":"10.1016/j.jnt.2012.02.023","title":"On an analogue of the Lutz–Nagell Theorem for hyperelliptic curves","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Number Theory","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Mathematics; Discriminant; Ring of integers; Algebraic number field; Monic polynomial; Combinatorics; Jacobian matrix and determinant; Torsion (gastropod); Order (exchange); Genus; Rational point; Discrete mathematics; Polynomial; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Algebraic number","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001870524,0.001126757,0.001818514,0.004635263,0.002969174,0.004250724,0.00240645,0.002636303,0.0159059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007694136,0.0005905356,0.001686229,0.002966309,0.005537711,0.01132426,0.004346303,0.005150815,0.001563334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00220342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006997709,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001880018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001201366,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991605,0.0002022506,0.00004570002,0.0001626822,0.0002659713,0.0001628437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975345,0.001157177,0.000280734,0.0003734083,0.0003774471,0.0002766498],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002107421,0.000009531153,0.00008164506,0.00003684691,0.000006147369,0.00006398489,0.0001023042,0.0005025885,0.0002714959,0.9950728,0.00144585,0.002385741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009745738,0.000007680847,0.0001591663,0.00001424682,0.000005787841,0.00007027063,0.00003553302,0.002005024,0.0001037292,0.9950765,0.002502355,0.00001005644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2690533,0.008093239,0.1814894,0.01749324,0.003922191,0.0001219792,0.0006244878,0.0005125717,0.5186895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.896462,0.004659266,0.02585666,0.003116083,0.004307201,0.00009553431,0.0005242859,0.0004302774,0.06454873],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0159059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0532105,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03831540919136403,"score_gpt":0.3146869717224902,"score_spread":0.2763715625311262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}