{"id":"W2091755682","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.11.009","title":"An approximate dynamic programming based approach to dual adaptive control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Advanced Control Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic programming; Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Process (computing); Monte Carlo method; State space; Control (management); State (computer science); Optimal control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009177983,0.0006623337,0.001229801,0.0006296565,0.0005103005,0.001271613,0.001330063,0.001122202,0.003500149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003061262,0.000639643,0.0006468753,0.0006299417,0.0009083248,0.001032269,0.001667984,0.001517638,0.0003958179],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006367696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007224355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002631934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00203016,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995946,0.0001467364,0.00001637489,0.0000532092,0.0001499925,0.00003910036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.000345047,0.00004022894,0.00005186977,0.0001559944,0.00003204133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008688647,0.00006323634,0.0001994148,0.00007379277,0.00004217638,0.00005073043,0.00005275603,0.857312,0.001504222,0.09224027,0.001166767,0.0472078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002593992,0.000008410654,0.00001277366,0.000001946865,0.00000216217,0.000004838116,0.000001795895,0.994816,0.00007499709,0.004834273,0.0002381787,0.000002016231],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002900671,0.0001008756,0.9942351,0.00009884848,0.00005777174,0.0000126603,0.00001040424,0.00004016099,0.002543517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6356297,0.0003808522,0.3496757,0.0002176917,0.0002419469,0.0002632879,0.0000919208,0.0001323627,0.01336659],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003500149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01170921,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005357573583237499,"score_gpt":0.2338389063923717,"score_spread":0.2284813328091342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}