{"id":"W2091755682","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2008.11.009","title":"An approximate dynamic programming based approach to dual adaptive control","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Process Control","topic":"Advanced Control Systems Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamic programming; Dual (grammatical number); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Process (computing); Monte Carlo method; State space; Control (management); State (computer science); Optimal control; Control theory (sociology); Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004903651,0.0003097949,0.0006754348,0.0003122128,0.00007769912,0.0001145022,0.0003124658,0.0001243006,0.000003051402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001241964,0.0002746908,0.0001353851,0.0003391373,0.00002016757,0.0007825566,0.00000251126,0.0003450138,0.000003054328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001911525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008451478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.251261e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001312643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979613,0.00008558655,0.0007931899,0.0002229866,0.0004679824,0.0004689154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984441,0.00007500922,0.0003707054,0.000223089,0.0005674146,0.0003196873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005062544,0.0001676831,0.0000323393,0.00005336632,0.00008949231,0.0000169925,0.0002466172,0.9715809,0.004514485,0.0001569714,0.00001010565,0.02262486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006076279,0.0008190541,0.0001572148,0.0000855683,0.0001083707,0.00005482611,0.0002117473,0.9917579,0.0001591164,0.0001849571,0.00008852402,0.0002964973],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.003383856,0.0004488174,0.9943367,0.0001566711,0.0001650069,0.0009522656,0.00001294602,0.0002047146,0.0003390764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638973,0.000001916271,0.03544727,0.0002711913,0.0002513541,0.0000659844,0.000003718838,0.00005377441,0.000007446988],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9605135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999706,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005357573583237499,"score_gpt":0.2338389063923717,"score_spread":0.2284813328091342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}