{"id":"W2091844576","doi":"10.1017/s0007123404000092","title":"Referendum Voting as Political Choice: The Case of Quebec","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Voting; Status quo bias; Public economics; Multicollinearity; Politics; Status quo; Economics; Political science; Positive economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Regression analysis; Computer science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002477606,0.0002686849,0.0007967736,0.001677144,0.004028101,0.002912642,0.001520155,0.001152955,0.00870707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008958354,0.0001320291,0.0005881008,0.005372645,0.002082522,0.001229691,0.000868395,0.001592386,0.0003604936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02890069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006863644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9870313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978552,0.0009482032,0.00003754581,0.0001962942,0.0003133882,0.0006492226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928005,0.003883082,0.0009213611,0.0004645829,0.001387318,0.0005431717],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001433433,0.000515572,0.6429051,0.0003080757,0.0007154357,0.00292357,0.01127587,0.03787936,0.001109343,0.2004955,0.0305802,0.06985861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003074703,0.0001542812,0.7992828,0.0001620111,0.0002864496,0.0003344888,0.01079707,0.1089101,0.0005105376,0.02288614,0.05616286,0.0002056691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.954571,0.002123067,0.001785695,0.004614322,0.00003708196,0.00006884137,0.002057012,0.00003258054,0.03471039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942842,0.000242737,0.0004328453,0.0001761704,0.000009572304,0.00001462159,0.0004769544,0.00000580918,0.004356942],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02890069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2096902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04704819640766918,"score_gpt":0.3836183567624699,"score_spread":0.3365701603548008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}