{"id":"W2091857898","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-6253.2005.00206.x","title":"THREE META-QUESTIONS IN EPISTEMOLOGY: RETHINKING SOME METAPHORS IN ZHUANGZI*","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chinese Philosophy","topic":"Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Philosophy; Chinese philosophy; Asian studies; China; Political science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004664253,0.0001937757,0.0004961743,0.00008381162,0.00008137512,0.00001124363,0.0002833331,0.00006680826,0.0009900228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000618318,0.0001150658,0.0002463786,0.0003395417,0.0002572982,0.0005341826,0.0001664496,0.0004306571,0.00007712236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002119844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003955975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007109735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003259733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985874,0.00007385726,0.0006016596,0.0001772769,0.0003445356,0.0002153192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994214,0.00007689551,0.0002885265,0.0001295959,0.000005335573,0.00007825877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001980355,0.001343836,0.943291,0.00002843267,0.0006176296,0.0003405268,0.00427729,0.0189697,0.007857908,0.003323846,0.001000271,0.01875152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008577043,0.0002202695,0.4523363,0.00003688837,0.0001519643,0.0001495999,0.00003684982,0.0002180384,0.000103101,0.5423107,0.003279237,0.0002993873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741377,0.002506734,0.00003024872,0.01156233,0.0001604831,0.0001019633,0.000002432801,0.000007217237,0.01149092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948119,0.0002992399,0.003541326,0.001002536,0.0002725133,0.000007421701,8.517115e-7,0.000009594091,0.00005464166],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5389868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999232,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02434410352352477,"score_gpt":0.2624993936485361,"score_spread":0.2381552901250114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}