{"id":"W2091977156","doi":"10.1103/physrevlett.109.070501","title":"Quantum Discord Bounds the Amount of Distributed Entanglement","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Letters","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council","keywords":"Quantum entanglement; Quantum discord; Quantum mechanics; Kullback–Leibler divergence; Squashed entanglement; Physics; Entropy (arrow of time); Quantum; Quantum capacity; Bounded function; Computer science; Statistical physics; Mathematics; Quantum network","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004222989,0.0004965939,0.0009303568,0.001524055,0.001345909,0.00304803,0.001961613,0.001315657,0.00234429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02389423,0.000496856,0.0005100916,0.0008799767,0.008756858,0.007170847,0.004191785,0.002635705,0.0002586256],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002181513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006062207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002944649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001574778,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9963814,0.001084398,0.0001538081,0.0007130832,0.001249127,0.000418194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9572505,0.03176503,0.002815822,0.00562629,0.00151647,0.001025919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006429032,0.00003093041,0.0005288261,0.00006819934,0.00001669904,0.0001321174,0.0001546556,0.01238906,0.00402498,0.9782718,0.0002331426,0.0040854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001768672,0.00005165174,0.0008298737,0.00003497803,0.00001336416,0.0001511671,0.00005443319,0.0926546,0.003995182,0.9010812,0.001091445,0.00002453267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4952163,0.002288991,0.4272097,0.003360686,0.0002067104,0.00006682069,0.0001991449,0.0002946814,0.07115701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912323,0.000366913,0.006734516,0.0001163186,0.0001018004,0.0000510898,0.00002678414,0.00004374729,0.001326392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004222989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02233356,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01749855902500507,"score_gpt":0.2834868968581664,"score_spread":0.2659883378331613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}