{"id":"W2092028557","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00359.x","title":"Uncommon Ground: The ‘Poverty of History’ in Common Property Discourse","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Development and Change","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":192,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Tragedy of the commons; Common-pool resource; Sociology; Law and economics; Property rights; Scholarship; Ideology; Collective action; Property (philosophy); Commons; Politics; Environmental ethics; Political science; Economics; Law; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001485543,0.00006745131,0.00007459621,0.00002408254,0.00008280425,0.000005575071,0.000120438,0.00002099146,0.0001320736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001389733,0.00003671524,0.00001260033,0.00007609309,0.0001158945,0.00007181077,0.0002050507,0.00004159887,0.00001916242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002848045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008306415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003776074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008598348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995156,0.00001550892,0.000101877,0.0001123883,0.000150532,0.0001041115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998381,0.000005662926,0.00004064732,0.00008974877,0.000002284225,0.00002356697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001294654,0.00009448182,0.9460121,0.00001554181,0.00000612645,0.000004014176,0.02639066,0.000006337509,0.00004938327,0.00002993214,0.00074915,0.02662936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002435513,0.00001300629,0.848491,0.0000139575,0.000003810496,4.013745e-7,0.0009060377,0.000008269321,0.00006199797,0.00004954171,0.1501432,0.00006524364],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936527,0.0001496443,0.000005389345,0.002097002,0.00005891566,0.0001998734,7.141911e-7,0.000007263064,0.003828511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977755,0.00004774719,0.0001151684,0.0009338697,0.000009760622,0.00001584866,0.000006003292,0.000002668526,0.001093454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1493941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.570832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04371850641312677,"score_gpt":0.2072603445640059,"score_spread":0.1635418381508791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}