{"id":"W2092043753","doi":"10.1682/jrrd.2007.10.0158","title":"Content validity of a home-based person-environment interaction assessment tool for visually impaired adults","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Visually impaired; Psychology; Applied psychology; Competence (human resources); Visual impairment; Content validity; Context (archaeology); Activities of daily living; Qualitative research; Focus group; Content analysis; Human–computer interaction; Computer science; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychometrics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0249098,0.0002710138,0.0007924255,0.002318549,0.0008793959,0.001736804,0.0008738138,0.00059523,0.001019799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08991201,0.0002707023,0.00100099,0.001577944,0.0009882697,0.001586853,0.00203586,0.0006611815,0.0002320669],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001936556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002692133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001974982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002370436,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9817284,0.008796786,0.003391892,0.000969608,0.004728941,0.0003842974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9044232,0.06767246,0.006235424,0.004538375,0.01630405,0.0008264313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009501403,0.001268194,0.6117369,0.001998984,0.0003373489,0.000384663,0.05957078,0.001219912,0.006349501,0.002229044,0.002174451,0.3117801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003002508,0.00235056,0.9273526,0.001416747,0.000290248,0.0009933988,0.03647648,0.01017869,0.005898215,0.002278927,0.01228561,0.0001783838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822496,0.0002322731,0.008332158,0.0002728164,0.00006437548,0.002720936,0.0003882985,0.000108672,0.005630885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780837,0.0001580843,0.01734291,0.0001024763,0.00001676623,0.003588428,0.0002702853,0.00002744939,0.0004098922],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0249098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1317372,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2438395387573447,"score_gpt":0.4348205827645909,"score_spread":0.1909810440072462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}