{"id":"W2092186669","doi":"10.1117/12.649016","title":"Comparison of linear and non-linear calibration methods for phase-shifting surface-geometry measurement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Optical measurement and interference techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Neptec Design Group (Canada); University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Phase (matter); Geometry; Surface (topology); Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Projection (relational algebra); Linear least squares; Linear equation; Distribution (mathematics); Linear phase; Least-squares function approximation; System of measurement; Mathematical analysis; Algorithm; Linear model; Physics; Statistics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003730097,0.0006451839,0.0004039345,0.00142858,0.0003826068,0.0008548504,0.001920399,0.0007373122,0.003094122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01094001,0.0004334065,0.0004728069,0.001275795,0.0006227351,0.001655474,0.001172192,0.0006235915,0.001440673],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007275129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007204291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001343934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002069041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956906,0.001077322,0.0001180872,0.0003499908,0.002648358,0.0001156158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929668,0.003795398,0.0003419732,0.0007690365,0.002070275,0.00005657354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001092135,0.0002598342,0.00377626,0.00148707,0.0002270176,0.0001722244,0.0007445551,0.03640135,0.09691493,0.01138731,0.002459586,0.8450779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002483054,0.0009218953,0.01369763,0.0002112641,0.0002791687,0.001262107,0.000434086,0.5966171,0.3545713,0.007309563,0.02410202,0.0003455585],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0276302,0.001594407,0.9646186,0.0001655297,0.00009801061,0.000136611,0.00007619212,0.001867596,0.003812816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2971523,0.001881404,0.6945281,0.0001952775,0.00006861118,0.0002559777,0.0002982285,0.0005278057,0.005092326],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003730097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01972693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05579118209424452,"score_gpt":0.3392487200383453,"score_spread":0.2834575379441008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}