{"id":"W2092186669","doi":"10.1117/12.649016","title":"Comparison of linear and non-linear calibration methods for phase-shifting surface-geometry measurement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE","topic":"Optical measurement and interference techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Neptec Design Group (Canada); University of Waterloo; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Calibration; Phase (matter); Geometry; Surface (topology); Mathematics; Range (aeronautics); Projection (relational algebra); Linear least squares; Linear equation; Distribution (mathematics); Linear phase; Least-squares function approximation; System of measurement; Mathematical analysis; Algorithm; Linear model; Physics; Statistics; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002119959,0.0002818394,0.0005354084,0.0001145995,0.0000938899,0.0001084688,0.00105336,0.0001741998,0.000004041868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000984838,0.0002362977,0.0003911724,0.0003420913,0.0001599867,0.0009407607,0.0002239358,0.000248367,2.764214e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000132014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003937594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004777491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.328867e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975418,5.898051e-8,0.000951174,0.0004113772,0.0007499132,0.0003456115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966214,0.0002109729,0.0005058483,0.00007952021,0.002465862,0.0001164494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006431524,0.0002545006,0.0003496266,0.0004066987,0.0001916806,5.747245e-9,0.0002878022,0.000132505,0.7870791,0.2054445,0.0004000549,0.005389231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000623089,0.0005456312,0.00006965765,0.0001851759,0.00005159046,9.633507e-7,0.0001726315,0.458751,0.5382786,0.0005533097,0.00061009,0.0001582345],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.914118,0.0001634026,0.08228711,0.001931216,0.0001401261,0.000714493,0.00001271177,0.0001011708,0.0005317736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4451691,0.00002085787,0.5545576,0.00003351843,0.0001383881,0.000046458,0.000001831777,0.00001811375,0.00001414564],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4722705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9635943,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05579118209424452,"score_gpt":0.3392487200383453,"score_spread":0.2834575379441008,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}