{"id":"W2092234072","doi":"10.1016/s0377-0427(99)00382-9","title":"Finding elliptic Fekete points sets: two numerical solution approaches","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics","topic":"Mathematical functions and polynomials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen","keywords":"Mathematics; Lipschitz continuity; Numerical analysis; Applied mathematics; Point (geometry); Set (abstract data type); Algebraic number; Function (biology); Mathematical optimization; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009370308,0.0002105065,0.0005319311,0.0001608689,0.0001756451,0.00008573139,0.0001479037,0.0000768591,0.0001501172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000218277,0.0001612453,0.0001362603,0.0002008934,0.00007273982,0.0001334066,0.00005738263,0.0002452563,0.00003361348],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004727488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005354662,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":4.20783e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.292199e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981265,0.00003583049,0.0009768611,0.0001417368,0.0004871356,0.000231954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997449,0.001499391,0.0006772074,0.00011841,0.0001194927,0.0001364964],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007250839,0.0006495625,0.00004344326,0.000383588,0.0001782818,0.00001205168,0.001134699,0.002626546,0.0002436048,0.984881,0.002835532,0.006939223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008907827,0.00008097399,0.00005868438,0.0001286551,0.0001379495,0.0007935749,0.0003116746,0.06224383,0.0001345712,0.9343569,0.0006622857,0.0002001722],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2482378,0.00008285329,0.7448532,0.000904512,0.000117916,0.0002250251,0.00000474254,0.00003412173,0.005539841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5178738,0.00001559636,0.481668,0.00008819097,0.0001879207,0.000006495063,0.000002904814,0.00002327645,0.0001338537],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.269636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1025467134915238,"score_gpt":0.3136911888236494,"score_spread":0.2111444753321257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}