{"id":"W2092329909","doi":"10.1111/faf.12090","title":"Fishing impact and environmental status in <scp>E</scp>uropean seas: a diagnosis from stock assessments and ecosystem indicators","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fish and Fisheries","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Fishing; Ecosystem; Stock (firearms); Stock assessment; Fishery; Marine ecosystem; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Geography; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002765837,0.0002447292,0.0002876477,0.00007286714,0.0001905264,0.000334055,0.00015458,0.0001082886,0.001047193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001782177,0.0002203653,0.00003235757,0.0001419947,0.0002807912,0.0006953693,0.0006576758,0.0002572239,0.000008840133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001307607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001041795,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00227494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002419431,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982193,0.0001749961,0.0002470693,0.0005217413,0.0003169848,0.0005199583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998912,0.0004014573,0.0000843096,0.0002201147,0.000001881737,0.0003801846],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001271424,0.0000456821,0.9322292,0.00001840623,0.00001931409,0.00001148979,0.001105426,0.000001050947,0.00004442973,0.000001296016,0.005968133,0.06054287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005047963,0.0002139056,0.8200689,0.00001317165,0.000009192825,0.000004381688,0.001346135,0.0006382518,0.00003093826,0.00007006932,0.1769872,0.0001130589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9738307,0.00006042701,0.00001836285,0.0001837296,0.00003799659,0.0002510601,0.0002836031,0.0000250107,0.02530913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981781,0.0008259124,0.0001633788,0.0002583928,0.00004661105,0.00005672996,0.0001044614,0.00002770887,0.0003386695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1710191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999866,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009845289314867205,"score_gpt":0.2331168307848055,"score_spread":0.2232715414699383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}