{"id":"W2092343534","doi":"10.1159/000184726","title":"Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cytogenetic and Genome Research","topic":"Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Comparative genomic hybridization; Biology; Copy number analysis; Copy-number variation; Computational biology; Gene dosage; False positive paradox; Genome; Identification (biology); Genetics; Population; Extant taxon; Genomics; Gene; Bioinformatics; Evolutionary biology; Gene expression; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001504618,0.001108032,0.001584881,0.001655186,0.0002058329,0.001086514,0.002041943,0.0007970128,0.002459132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005279333,0.0005221019,0.0009529536,0.00172012,0.0005805638,0.0009023172,0.0006164458,0.001116267,0.0009719882],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006148826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008809805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003041248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00310307,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995793,0.0001537812,0.00003406005,0.00008636268,0.0001307028,0.00001584943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996772,0.00278456,0.00009203803,0.000114482,0.0002088259,0.00002806314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007334618,0.00009800914,0.002653951,0.00252342,0.0004683394,0.0001692288,0.00006867609,0.2378121,0.001855811,0.03755589,0.0093706,0.7073507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001044848,0.0001061351,0.003947428,0.0007344464,0.0002422079,0.0006804896,0.0001038277,0.818709,0.003310513,0.1091635,0.06279048,0.0001074845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.006349859,0.08925054,0.8942947,0.001675255,0.0003057453,0.0001239777,0.0005190173,0.001176897,0.006304008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0625008,0.1097954,0.8209159,0.0004960941,0.0003499764,0.0005774407,0.001239717,0.0002632176,0.003861394],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003041248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008226633,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09207954354924926,"score_gpt":0.4585318115520866,"score_spread":0.3664522680028374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}