{"id":"W2092389956","doi":"10.1007/s00125-010-1933-3","title":"Intensive glycaemic control and cancer risk in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of major trials","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Diabetologia","topic":"Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes; Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; Canada Research Chairs; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Type 2 diabetes; Meta-analysis; Medicine; Diabetes mellitus; Human physiology; Internal medicine; Type 1 diabetes; Oncology; Endocrinology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003938492,0.001460408,0.007528349,0.0008463314,0.0001756846,0.001098089,0.001091475,0.0009044467,0.001936341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004545607,0.0005785493,0.008048987,0.001997248,0.0002155343,0.0005156851,0.0005977514,0.001319442,0.0001802948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007182248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009898928,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006078257,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986454,0.0006827404,0.0002177675,0.0002460063,0.0001388268,0.00006935869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968912,0.002343083,0.0004181343,0.0001151054,0.0001489002,0.00008358332],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01714188,0.0001338741,0.01148131,0.1747877,0.5733187,0.0002884543,0.00006962712,0.001774174,0.001224168,0.0004377966,0.007006806,0.2123356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006355247,0.001101788,0.02598332,0.01225858,0.9325578,0.0004360657,0.0000754553,0.0005380617,0.0005628366,0.001567068,0.01847636,0.0000875129],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.002587639,0.9966121,0.0002927346,0.000136124,0.00008390601,0.00002025876,0.0001383816,0.000009931842,0.0001188943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06356005,0.9334723,0.001362226,0.0006721307,0.0002991079,0.00006916517,0.0003482894,0.00001111112,0.0002054972],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007528349,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02082902,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07313113840900431,"score_gpt":0.3644094964176943,"score_spread":0.29127835800869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}