{"id":"W2092481779","doi":"10.1016/j.electacta.2005.10.043","title":"Thermodynamic approach to the double layer capacity of a Pt(111) electrode in perchloric acid solutions","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electrochimica Acta","topic":"Electrochemical Analysis and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Perchloric acid; Chemistry; Double layer (biology); Electrode; Adsorption; Electrode potential; Hydrogen chloride; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Charge density; Work (physics); Layer (electronics); Thermodynamics; Electrochemistry; Inorganic chemistry; Physical chemistry; Chromatography; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004936758,0.000311965,0.0005223296,0.0009977021,0.0004139669,0.0006804921,0.001238203,0.0005819841,0.002102244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001053461,0.0003717448,0.0003266282,0.0004118987,0.0008073851,0.001000894,0.0004085053,0.001330869,0.0004417512],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001006758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004844412,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001977619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002678218,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996909,0.0000461168,0.00001602545,0.00005588228,0.0001590046,0.00003215709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998049,0.0001073507,0.00001360281,0.00001378833,0.00005273864,0.000007758005],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001868771,0.0002279717,0.001918712,0.001126965,0.00009183664,0.0004833369,0.0004169121,0.07066862,0.7293172,0.1522983,0.001182692,0.04208052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002813048,0.0001641017,0.002685131,0.00004765596,0.00002782583,0.0003717008,0.0001425844,0.3780062,0.5849064,0.02541272,0.008145125,0.0000624473],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6909113,0.009090288,0.255713,0.002404431,0.0004303194,0.0003330227,0.001486748,0.0005514576,0.03907943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823818,0.001784127,0.009464213,0.0001182204,0.00009485253,0.00013663,0.000289201,0.00005465587,0.005676243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002102244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007304549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02256870480776589,"score_gpt":0.2356825131142126,"score_spread":0.2131138083064467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}