{"id":"W209252254","doi":"","title":"Khelawon: The Principled Approach to Hearsay Revisited","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hearsay; Testimonial; Supreme court; Admissible evidence; Reliability (semiconductor); Confrontation Clause; Federal Rules of Evidence; Law; Psychology; Epistemology; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Sociology; Philosophy; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02954148,0.0005599735,0.001259863,0.002233813,0.01121898,0.01207816,0.005210816,0.02033319,0.003503237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04179253,0.001063937,0.001581752,0.001941817,0.03734091,0.01091463,0.005461973,0.03113473,0.0006421057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01661876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02203612,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08003819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09360765,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9701167,0.01178201,0.001896615,0.003854377,0.009510444,0.002839799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825636,0.01221616,0.0005887138,0.0009597167,0.003274935,0.0003968836],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007808075,0.000003403342,0.00006555251,0.00003155998,0.000004286812,0.00005678326,0.001072729,0.00007148994,0.00004932385,0.9923627,0.003662579,0.00261171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042636,0.00001887067,0.0005731483,0.0004037466,0.00002313852,0.0001692827,0.001318611,0.000876936,0.0002988739,0.9160509,0.08016517,0.00005870546],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01767145,0.01868782,0.05300819,0.6410185,0.004851353,0.0002454244,0.0002655323,0.00006898255,0.2641827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6388935,0.007428988,0.03854491,0.2448602,0.00380257,0.0006097794,0.00008861355,0.0001166246,0.0656549],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08003819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1591446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03940033143006439,"score_gpt":0.3080081986644263,"score_spread":0.2686078672343619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}