{"id":"W2092607609","doi":"10.1038/sj.jes.7500640","title":"Infiltration of forest fire and residential wood smoke: an evaluation of air cleaner effectiveness","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":171,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Centre for Disease Control; University of Northern British Columbia; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"HEPA; Environmental science; Smoke; Aerodynamic diameter; Particulates; Infiltration (HVAC); Air pollution; Environmental engineering; Indoor air quality; Waste management; Meteorology; Aerosol; Filter (signal processing); Geography; Engineering; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003196403,0.0004734231,0.0009980752,0.0004400258,0.0003343691,0.0006876391,0.0006102766,0.0007326297,0.001376783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004794266,0.0002194787,0.0008399445,0.0004260243,0.0005281667,0.0006492993,0.0005779937,0.0004544522,0.0001689808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004674804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005430182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002925042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002843892,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968042,0.001855002,0.000214403,0.0002033255,0.0007211665,0.0002019114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948089,0.003621007,0.0006447193,0.0002168283,0.0003717766,0.000336674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.2530811,0.01912426,0.518115,0.0005645948,0.001371787,0.0003324554,0.001941872,0.009964189,0.04822569,0.0003730843,0.0001568191,0.1467492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002343253,0.1911087,0.7332057,0.00003921507,0.00258319,0.0004874191,0.001111319,0.01797957,0.04957069,0.0002327753,0.00125971,0.00007843727],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990848,0.0001804031,0.0002340582,0.000009663565,0.000003941411,0.00002927166,0.0000323656,0.000005858667,0.0004195935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989754,0.0001319996,0.0004109702,0.0000127656,0.00001427313,0.00002741413,0.00005458768,0.000005995429,0.0003666302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003196403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01690441,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06983224992668714,"score_gpt":0.3798555418627147,"score_spread":0.3100232919360276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}