{"id":"W2092848112","doi":"10.1139/x05-229","title":"Quantifying the coarse-root biomass of intensively managed loblolly pine plantations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Taproot; Agronomy; Hardwood; Environmental science; Loblolly pine; Productivity; Vegetation (pathology); Carbon sequestration; Biomass partitioning; Woody plant; Botany; Pinus <genus>; Biology; Ecology; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002386527,0.0002255864,0.000199589,0.0005068506,0.0003141048,0.0003236132,0.0001983606,0.0001537721,0.0003091125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002529583,0.0001200191,0.000117721,0.0002745083,0.000295637,0.0001770076,0.0002119124,0.0001471987,0.00008127606],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000501673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000237636,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01944203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08327314,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998288,0.00002527529,0.00001051841,0.00005894479,0.0000357642,0.00004069365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996451,0.00004336654,0.0001299556,0.00002575572,0.00004945058,0.0001063053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005655619,0.0002202426,0.5887469,0.00004883471,0.00009711053,0.0001753648,0.0007384782,0.0005020629,0.3994421,0.00003758763,0.00005035477,0.009375504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001675698,0.0000772533,0.9983089,8.908233e-7,0.000005865204,0.00001483429,0.00005058849,0.0001015118,0.001375167,0.000004994462,0.00005678078,0.000001494253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998291,0.00001947306,0.00004007625,7.027211e-7,2.220605e-7,0.000002934065,0.00003517111,0.000001180496,0.00007118676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990478,0.0000378314,0.0003699871,0.000007685944,0.000001617171,0.00001400061,0.0002232631,0.00000283421,0.0002948324],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01944203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03865772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05500578691667419,"score_gpt":0.3060675010046206,"score_spread":0.2510617140879464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}