{"id":"W2093000758","doi":"10.1142/s0218001401000873","title":"CLASSIFICATION OF SIMILAR 2-D OBJECTS BY WAVELET-SPARSE-MATRIX (WSM) METHOD","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence","topic":"Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Wavelet; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Zernike polynomials; Discriminative model; Invariant (physics); Matrix (chemical analysis); Computer science; Sparse matrix; Moment (physics); Mathematics; Computer vision; Algorithm; Physics; Optics; Gaussian","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007327095,0.000137693,0.0002112642,0.0003013169,0.00005356995,0.0001606555,0.0006761667,0.00008430126,0.000130673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001864239,0.0001248442,0.0001177923,0.0002646488,0.0000835633,0.0006428665,0.00007325762,0.0002006981,0.00003405092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004819034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005678667,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000213549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004721192,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980391,0.0001398667,0.000886698,0.0002258213,0.0005648573,0.0001436749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997551,0.0002069925,0.0007950836,0.0001501611,0.001199131,0.00009761556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004215644,0.0001727211,0.0002141044,0.000007986907,0.00004119406,0.00002009343,0.0003286244,0.00000291184,0.06676349,0.001404495,0.000161614,0.9308406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001635694,0.000339522,0.0009538752,0.0002273066,0.00003088814,0.0004886095,0.000650394,0.04410006,0.8795699,0.0699373,0.003212408,0.0003261004],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02151093,0.0001669574,0.9746042,0.00280875,0.0004913837,0.00009062004,0.00002589503,0.00003347687,0.0002677961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689959,0.0009833772,0.02940155,0.0003504576,0.0001812283,0.000004595383,0.00001591792,0.000009002379,0.00005799361],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.947485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5091,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09341752183731349,"score_gpt":0.3615759898650253,"score_spread":0.2681584680277118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}