{"id":"W2093043874","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017","title":"GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2369,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Econometrics; Credibility; Statistics; Quality (philosophy); Statistical hypothesis testing; Consistency (knowledge bases); Omnibus test; Point estimation; Publication bias; Meta-analysis; Confidence interval; Medicine; Subgroup analysis; Psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null}