{"id":"W2093097389","doi":"10.1002/etc.5620190110","title":"Application of<i>Ceriodaphnia dubia</i>for whole effluent toxicity tests in the hawkesbury–nepean watershed, New South Wales, Australia: Method development and validation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ceriodaphnia dubia; Diazinon; Effluent; Biology; Toxicology; Acute toxicity; Toxicity; Cladocera; Pesticide; Ecology; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Medicine; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002681025,0.0006594449,0.0004177114,0.0009602655,0.0008175798,0.0007111321,0.0006823416,0.0004380301,0.0008772894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001853881,0.0003228041,0.0004405619,0.0006721654,0.0007088947,0.0002615439,0.0006495081,0.0003719509,0.0004508243],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001040192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001798449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03819737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07173362,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979194,0.0003634865,0.0002057887,0.0004759694,0.0009325527,0.0001027871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986305,0.0001392881,0.0002221474,0.0001372092,0.0008070771,0.00006373734],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000151323,0.0001982758,0.03032985,0.0002564086,0.00003895423,0.0001152949,0.0003142352,0.0008569939,0.9506994,0.00009349287,0.0001807055,0.01676508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006799643,0.003482915,0.2185215,0.00009940918,0.0001260843,0.0005084552,0.0006201371,0.006285836,0.7589907,0.0000890017,0.01115317,0.00005475475],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9511157,0.0004499726,0.03768209,0.00008919034,0.00002856311,0.002900141,0.001227758,0.0002349169,0.006271753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8669096,0.0009028916,0.1209207,0.0002318262,0.00001440582,0.002746854,0.002828578,0.0001076185,0.005337727],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03819737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07595009,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01185441146351912,"score_gpt":0.2420570367748953,"score_spread":0.2302026253113762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}