{"id":"W2093100702","doi":"10.1002/qj.505","title":"On the impact of high‐resolution, high‐frequency meteorological forcing on Denmark Strait ocean circulation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","topic":"Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Natural Environment Research Council; Princeton University; Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; National Aeronautics and Space Administration; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Climatology; Hydrography; Environmental science; Atmospheric circulation; Forcing (mathematics); Ocean current; Sea ice; Atmospheric model; Geology; Oceanography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001517621,0.0004601613,0.0003935437,0.000492393,0.0004399196,0.001438733,0.000372917,0.0006054915,0.001669497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005450032,0.0003033497,0.0007063356,0.0004688587,0.0005411766,0.0007315351,0.0008298474,0.0005921507,0.0002061866],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001100955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005194259,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04291241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02724861,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999222,0.0003101563,0.00005890599,0.0001179585,0.0001795066,0.000111322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945597,0.003975536,0.0004262356,0.0003837423,0.0004024171,0.00025238],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001297373,0.0003375286,0.3190799,0.000319463,0.0009404949,0.0008005795,0.0001718579,0.6267076,0.03201045,0.001697354,0.00183541,0.01480194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223586,0.0004183663,0.6887209,0.00005235785,0.0002704744,0.00008516692,0.0002680603,0.2982247,0.009568121,0.0004721108,0.001716105,0.00008134019],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965857,0.0002596524,0.0005330425,0.0002557737,0.00003618589,0.000008060115,0.0003496308,0.0000414772,0.001930436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992141,0.0000886991,0.0002121044,0.00003094039,0.00001124122,0.000002395339,0.0001954434,0.0000118527,0.0002333062],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04291241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0853253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01169105797065816,"score_gpt":0.218836972312434,"score_spread":0.2071459143417758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}