{"id":"W2093173085","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.09.002","title":"Playing monopoly in the creek: Imperfect competition, development, and in-stream flows","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resource and Energy Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Monopoly; Competition (biology); Public good; Economics; Frontier; Imperfect competition; Riparian zone; Wetland; Imperfect; Natural resource economics; Upstream (networking); Microeconomics; Business; Habitat; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009685998,0.000124704,0.0002278054,0.0001735941,0.0001271945,0.00007614373,0.0001055485,0.00009226426,0.00003801889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009718129,0.0001432434,0.00002643562,0.00006300655,0.00005145957,0.0001598383,0.00005136247,0.0000998934,0.00001792404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001386333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007008407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008907586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006911812,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988816,0.00001380069,0.0005280197,0.0003112568,0.00001132342,0.0002540346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995715,0.00009614562,0.000132953,0.0001461291,0.000001465193,0.00005183397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001841227,0.0000424716,0.9502372,0.000007953997,0.00001347471,0.000003062716,0.001160131,0.0008670298,0.000005703381,0.03454508,0.00003040141,0.01306912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008329353,0.00002777492,0.8772397,0.00001436768,0.000002494305,0.00001577853,0.001235737,0.006625528,0.0000517281,0.003148457,0.1105224,0.0002830671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748337,0.001089753,0.0002298132,0.0001221626,0.00003917171,0.00004986667,0.000007477802,0.000006958792,0.02362113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979699,0.0008809063,0.0003869831,0.0004674406,0.0000556146,0.00001318035,0.00003174269,0.00001501082,0.0001792766],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.110492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5841297,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03572721097069846,"score_gpt":0.1900309996369984,"score_spread":0.1543037886663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}