{"id":"W2093173085","doi":"10.1016/j.reseneeco.2007.09.002","title":"Playing monopoly in the creek: Imperfect competition, development, and in-stream flows","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Resource and Energy Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Monopoly; Competition (biology); Public good; Economics; Frontier; Imperfect competition; Riparian zone; Wetland; Imperfect; Natural resource economics; Upstream (networking); Microeconomics; Business; Habitat; Ecology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002051514,0.0002768465,0.001507621,0.0007167063,0.001623748,0.005752772,0.001408709,0.002608757,0.01456136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00728738,0.0004263036,0.0004735143,0.001337113,0.00326166,0.006007581,0.00182899,0.001749174,0.0004498241],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003544945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002963818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03107432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05363751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990475,0.0003458621,0.00003051126,0.0001434652,0.0001221372,0.0003104818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948002,0.002462583,0.0008520965,0.0002307687,0.0003952789,0.001259083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005166078,0.0004746722,0.0368197,0.0001081122,0.000102067,0.001015917,0.001082096,0.1069468,0.001573369,0.8197266,0.007260206,0.02437384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001513506,0.0001163626,0.02253218,0.00004273496,0.00008554727,0.0001505613,0.002483913,0.1726247,0.000433936,0.7972713,0.004043712,0.00006369306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100988,0.0005514316,0.02114137,0.00621414,0.00003779284,0.00005035032,0.0002573973,0.0000596418,0.06158911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995777,0.0001238417,0.0004902956,0.00007890257,0.00001948033,0.000005799433,0.00001924637,0.000007069911,0.003478494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03107432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06178689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03572721097069846,"score_gpt":0.1900309996369984,"score_spread":0.1543037886663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}