{"id":"W2093178451","doi":"10.3152/147154302781781128","title":"Defining a safe genetically modified organism: boundaries of scientific risk assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Legitimacy; Uncertainty; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Genetically modified organism; Organism; Risk assessment; Citizen journalism; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Political science; Economics; Biotechnology; Biology; Computer science; Environmental science; Law; Politics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00188761,0.0001503924,0.0001928937,0.0001713634,0.002097929,0.002009123,0.0008385524,0.00008098844,0.0006845796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001930749,0.0000667284,0.00004213281,0.003199816,0.005245229,0.0003790098,0.0004901262,0.000197162,0.00006030201],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008188577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006439577,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001019483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002386943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968221,0.0001129819,0.0002969359,0.000590875,0.001313229,0.0008639252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984044,0.0001713414,0.0001059217,0.0001875595,0.0006417566,0.0004889644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004276407,0.0001825454,0.01099625,0.000009412139,0.00000981696,0.000001804267,0.000469287,0.00000340314,0.4516368,0.1737613,0.0005692155,0.3623559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006396376,0.001055162,0.861576,0.00002474168,0.00002612852,0.00005013049,0.0009462063,0.01123017,0.03237684,0.0387146,0.05253981,0.0008205812],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9748395,0.0002016028,0.00005058985,0.007894676,0.00009205605,0.0001744565,0.00005592848,0.00003784267,0.01665334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997852,0.0001053653,0.001420213,0.0002254173,0.00008177321,0.000008729843,0.000004853889,0.000001514371,0.0003001829],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992012,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03528427429386263,"score_gpt":0.2795373273282774,"score_spread":0.2442530530344147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}