{"id":"W2093178451","doi":"10.3152/147154302781781128","title":"Defining a safe genetically modified organism: boundaries of scientific risk assessment","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Public Policy","topic":"Genetically Modified Organisms Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Precautionary principle; Legitimacy; Uncertainty; Variety (cybernetics); Business; Genetically modified organism; Organism; Risk assessment; Citizen journalism; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental planning; Political science; Economics; Biotechnology; Biology; Computer science; Environmental science; Law; Politics; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1593767,0.001115288,0.002506014,0.00621183,0.01058275,0.02957574,0.006074971,0.02450406,0.002442378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1334715,0.001202752,0.001637038,0.003052095,0.1143099,0.03492789,0.02159188,0.0177578,0.0007561737],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01033246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02626626,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002830113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001568508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8690846,0.07961052,0.01082056,0.007958042,0.02965628,0.002869949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7691286,0.1796842,0.01639168,0.015569,0.01513156,0.004094993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001525279,0.00002721838,0.0002831798,0.0001142042,0.00001265053,0.00008690623,0.003957419,0.000628618,0.00036494,0.9854956,0.0008425768,0.008171469],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008536501,0.00001806572,0.0001287137,0.0002326328,0.000008120401,0.00006529641,0.001514936,0.0004003115,0.0002965481,0.977539,0.01976303,0.00002484954],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04009466,0.03280085,0.3926325,0.3091204,0.002138034,0.0006017754,0.0001366987,0.0001826949,0.2222924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7731454,0.008376976,0.1880543,0.02213171,0.001543908,0.00122145,0.0001046559,0.000141821,0.005279845],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8428748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03528427429386263,"score_gpt":0.2795373273282774,"score_spread":0.2442530530344147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}