{"id":"W2093195495","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2011.04.050","title":"The Werther effect reconsidered in light of psychological vulnerabilities: Results of a pilot study","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Affective Disorders","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Injury prevention; Dissociation (chemistry); Human factors and ergonomics; Cognition; Population; Occupational safety and health; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Medicine; Medical emergency","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007293872,0.0004247372,0.0008282567,0.0003253403,0.0008794739,0.0009410155,0.001011934,0.001172444,0.01010618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02356119,0.0002223101,0.0005425204,0.0001977378,0.002390208,0.001582765,0.001016085,0.001109204,0.0009793292],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002965873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007049583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008992326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00156583,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972876,0.001670446,0.0001542959,0.0003369921,0.0003982152,0.000152394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831324,0.01277988,0.0008148606,0.002564964,0.0004119874,0.0002958782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.07750835,0.03154635,0.4124232,0.00160503,0.00176107,0.01743566,0.0418487,0.0006382567,0.06736062,0.03252755,0.004773987,0.3105713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00683716,0.08394356,0.7752563,0.0004389826,0.005114489,0.008873717,0.03259295,0.001918491,0.02515455,0.03024378,0.02938788,0.0002379975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906502,0.0004130463,0.001214936,0.0005867056,0.0001457124,0.0002826247,0.00009947976,0.00001893641,0.006588437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971172,0.0001548895,0.0005273521,0.0002050266,0.0000399677,0.00005410467,0.00003062414,0.00002161663,0.001849301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01010618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0385741,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05306967162788715,"score_gpt":0.3474165888906711,"score_spread":0.2943469172627839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}