{"id":"W2093249318","doi":"10.1057/rm.2012.7","title":"Supply chain risk management – I: Conceptualization, framework and planning process","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Risk Management","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptualization; Supply chain risk management; Risk management; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management plan; Supply chain; IT risk management; Supply chain management; Process (computing); Process management; Business; Computer science; Risk management framework; Knowledge management; Service management; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662393,0.001170172,0.0005405157,0.003246235,0.00186945,0.009049918,0.0025989,0.003070613,0.003996991],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003915839,0.00103446,0.00128409,0.004421053,0.007771104,0.009369697,0.003541026,0.003155314,0.0005698031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007918513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008418934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005104579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980958,0.0007712711,0.0002123033,0.0002350739,0.0005245941,0.0001610005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976081,0.0009990407,0.0006041644,0.0001908066,0.000434426,0.0001634862],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007074626,0.00005119084,0.000982654,0.0001442754,0.00001246526,0.000115157,0.001528869,0.0159246,0.0003190107,0.9606709,0.001318972,0.01892479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006847202,0.00006197248,0.001300065,0.0009485163,0.00002506492,0.0003585312,0.002941281,0.0556386,0.001175886,0.8985149,0.03897243,0.00005598127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01478163,0.005814677,0.930254,0.01024978,0.0001104788,0.0006436583,0.0001839301,0.0001694702,0.03779241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5428274,0.009931626,0.4345544,0.0008500861,0.0002451022,0.001067711,0.0004214615,0.0001122404,0.009989952],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009069361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05745304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01058079612255844,"score_gpt":0.2521012042506667,"score_spread":0.2415204081281083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}