{"id":"W2093259703","doi":"10.1142/s0129183107010929","title":"LATTICE–BOLTZMANN SIMULATION OF DENSE NANOFLOWS: A COMPARISON WITH MOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND NAVIER–STOKES SOLUTIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Modern Physics C","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lattice Boltzmann methods; Nanoscopic scale; Molecular dynamics; Statistical physics; Work (physics); Boltzmann equation; Physics; Mechanics; Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Thermodynamics; Nanotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004943035,0.0004206255,0.0007646875,0.0004360681,0.0004172637,0.0006123016,0.0007294491,0.0008599873,0.0009340491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001484523,0.0003109631,0.0003810766,0.0004891712,0.0006742149,0.0006463656,0.000576467,0.0006826867,0.0001715933],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006064698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000847139,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01005364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003628219,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998153,0.00004724486,0.00001131208,0.00001812161,0.00008166154,0.00002636518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993753,0.0003501642,0.00005047589,0.00005051548,0.00009003845,0.00008348985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001972496,0.0002104274,0.00257833,0.0001220917,0.00004594953,0.0001080421,0.0002457821,0.956288,0.01675775,0.01469633,0.000193194,0.008556855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002615758,0.00001508237,0.0001487318,0.000002675263,0.000002139176,0.000006513235,0.00001208373,0.9971887,0.001535962,0.0008422016,0.0002155335,0.000004198532],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8516359,0.0007218835,0.1387875,0.0007017417,0.0001406961,0.0001095253,0.0002341184,0.0004158554,0.00725272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9353284,0.0005171369,0.06199648,0.00009479722,0.00002935382,0.0001211685,0.0002054699,0.00007724472,0.001629918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01005364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01999021,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974433793359674,"score_gpt":0.2869529555380659,"score_spread":0.2672086176044692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}