{"id":"W2093259703","doi":"10.1142/s0129183107010929","title":"LATTICE–BOLTZMANN SIMULATION OF DENSE NANOFLOWS: A COMPARISON WITH MOLECULAR DYNAMICS AND NAVIER–STOKES SOLUTIONS","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Modern Physics C","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Lattice Boltzmann methods; Nanoscopic scale; Molecular dynamics; Statistical physics; Work (physics); Boltzmann equation; Physics; Mechanics; Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Thermodynamics; Nanotechnology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000247907,0.0001429619,0.0002636168,0.0001446202,0.00004195907,0.00003219235,0.0001595882,0.00004748767,0.00000237054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003421242,0.0001314511,0.00007893743,0.0001061553,0.00007525929,0.0003270027,0.00004408498,0.0001750471,0.000001507023],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000160005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003249601,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003140361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001760622,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986395,0.00001676884,0.0005398665,0.00009095846,0.0005584451,0.0001544678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985287,0.0002012409,0.000303267,0.00009757552,0.0008090787,0.00006009023],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009359242,0.00006692823,0.004853481,0.00002253693,0.0004557175,0.00002074876,0.001359179,0.97087,0.002430605,0.001802591,0.000008159534,0.01801647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008336348,0.00006128589,0.005187818,0.000141601,0.00009471001,0.00002665127,0.0001836295,0.9876333,0.00206138,0.003582231,0.00005137308,0.0001424243],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4837025,0.0004692959,0.5153008,0.00003833545,0.0001397702,0.00004292595,0.000009275371,0.00001656734,0.0002805857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949263,0.00002591572,0.004840699,0.0000234762,0.0001361304,7.630651e-7,0.000005635387,0.00002661281,0.00001444061],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5112238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5360422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974433793359674,"score_gpt":0.2869529555380659,"score_spread":0.2672086176044692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}