{"id":"W2093277130","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.027","title":"Task-directed software inspection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Software inspection; Suite; Task (project management); Software; Process (computing); Computer science; Visual inspection; Variety (cybernetics); Software engineering; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Software development; Systems engineering; Software quality; Artificial intelligence; Business; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001316291,0.0005794731,0.0005288536,0.0006609827,0.0005293051,0.0005683613,0.001170014,0.0008242335,0.003316171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006099071,0.000358684,0.000390862,0.0003697912,0.0004837448,0.0006702841,0.001269669,0.0007823365,0.0008198543],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003318843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001267543,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002911038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005236678,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990339,0.0002937665,0.00004351746,0.0001579748,0.0003489918,0.0001218763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954081,0.001713375,0.000344689,0.00113362,0.001113159,0.0002869552],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001584401,0.001255986,0.01135383,0.0004657243,0.0001097515,0.0008643627,0.000950556,0.1336774,0.1567475,0.03228683,0.01459973,0.6461039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006966194,0.0004545918,0.00596634,0.00004460652,0.00006654286,0.0004180829,0.0001939329,0.9013972,0.04858484,0.03580298,0.006952177,0.00004896382],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1696676,0.0001584872,0.8130696,0.0002057424,0.000099417,0.0001789818,0.00009830038,0.005459755,0.01106223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.840986,0.00009366122,0.1501412,0.0001161704,0.00001787319,0.00007241762,0.0002149897,0.0002401166,0.008117637],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003316171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01109368,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01399848264793407,"score_gpt":0.2397085514835722,"score_spread":0.2257100688356381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}