{"id":"W2093277130","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.027","title":"Task-directed software inspection","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Systems and Software","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Software inspection; Suite; Task (project management); Software; Process (computing); Computer science; Visual inspection; Variety (cybernetics); Software engineering; Engineering; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Software development; Systems engineering; Software quality; Artificial intelligence; Business; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008160122,0.0001393671,0.0002919242,0.0002923213,0.0001366552,0.0002561511,0.0003544357,0.00009575609,0.000004174223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002574957,0.000114592,0.00007719934,0.0004551395,0.00003003853,0.0005527662,0.0000540985,0.0003153389,0.000008504145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001026513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001430203,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002291291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001349956,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984862,0.0001198323,0.0004246709,0.0001896398,0.0005215063,0.0002581137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983048,0.0005180467,0.0002245929,0.0002892813,0.000455676,0.0002076373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006905589,0.0004996728,0.8651115,0.001441849,0.0006941734,0.001608661,0.005471987,0.00736803,0.0017637,0.01460366,0.04990879,0.05145895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009326632,0.003782359,0.6537457,0.003792504,0.0001569252,0.03302244,0.001347934,0.0131407,0.002304298,0.005491008,0.2705887,0.003300824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.146029,0.005557761,0.845691,0.00005315791,0.001985403,0.0001349828,0.000002253642,0.0005103092,0.00003613769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427409,0.0001179173,0.05668805,0.00002213954,0.0001845328,0.000005123274,3.579866e-7,0.00002018394,0.0002207904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7967119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4672925,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01399848264793407,"score_gpt":0.2397085514835722,"score_spread":0.2257100688356381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}