{"id":"W2093278853","doi":"10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.06.004","title":"Effects of agent heterogeneity in the presence of a land-market: A systematic test in an agent-based laboratory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers Environment and Urban Systems","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Spatial heterogeneity; Agent-based model; Stylized fact; Macro; Study heterogeneity; Socioeconomic status; Preference; Land cover; Land use; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Ecology; Population; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005888162,0.0001693634,0.0003986937,0.00005831144,0.00003364094,0.00003865319,0.0003516206,0.00006115295,0.00002743248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000102262,0.0001094747,0.00003948412,0.0001403777,0.00004978649,0.0001882408,0.00009867586,0.00006276758,0.00002460644],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006487159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004324171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008502861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001563482,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982028,0.0004897433,0.000494758,0.0002781629,0.0003202448,0.0002142717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988909,0.0004287688,0.0002368814,0.0003684284,0.000003265235,0.00007172539],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000734892,0.000303234,0.9852684,0.006255254,0.00001093659,0.00001108829,0.001026158,0.005015437,0.001917291,0.000001577555,0.0001546539,0.00002860851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009077034,0.0002710668,0.8549997,0.002119683,0.00002950625,0.000002708939,0.0002585392,0.1405557,0.0005890903,0.00000335776,0.00006492254,0.0001980989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972349,0.0009697822,0.0001165516,0.00001624063,0.00008862354,0.001517431,0.000006419029,0.000007195506,0.00004279045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996442,0.00002959583,0.00004439056,0.00004251604,0.00001651711,0.0002041409,0.000002906335,0.000009113574,0.000006675923],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1355402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4464251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006607747838785767,"score_gpt":0.180013258499296,"score_spread":0.1734055106605102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}