{"id":"W2093298860","doi":"10.1061/(asce)0887-3801(2008)22:2(114)","title":"Condition Assessment of Buried Pipes Using Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning Model","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering","topic":"Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Evidential reasoning approach; Piping; Process (computing); Engineering; Case-based reasoning; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Decision support system","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00242424,0.0006403194,0.0007003302,0.001566559,0.0003958661,0.001429482,0.001419958,0.001215567,0.00122719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007826253,0.0003691368,0.001088282,0.0007881584,0.0007542637,0.001964523,0.0009321648,0.0008099959,0.00017473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008884933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009760369,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003828293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002931118,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984429,0.0004823277,0.0001323981,0.0002590023,0.0005883657,0.00009508608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973975,0.001500891,0.0003888301,0.0001991234,0.0004458223,0.0000677184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001443237,0.00008337255,0.002460269,0.0001765127,0.0001001883,0.0006295965,0.0004991119,0.8811619,0.008458588,0.04203153,0.0006604048,0.0635942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009596948,0.00001891537,0.0002226622,0.000006911769,0.00001664711,0.00003453243,0.00001814319,0.9859644,0.0007683891,0.01277793,0.0001521515,0.000009652149],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03319872,0.0001022121,0.9649782,0.00012463,0.00000971352,0.00004223596,0.00006761013,0.0001457767,0.001330964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7975236,0.0001445513,0.2011333,0.00003674271,0.00001868246,0.00006850407,0.0001405114,0.00001050119,0.0009235289],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003828293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01282078,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01802378889708608,"score_gpt":0.277216811819737,"score_spread":0.259193022922651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}