{"id":"W2093368514","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2009.12.007","title":"The development of metaphorical language comprehension in typical development and in Williams syndrome","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Williams Syndrome Research","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Medical Research Council; European Commission; Williams Syndrome Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Literal and figurative language; Comprehension; Categorization; Language development; Cognition; Williams syndrome; Similarity (geometry); Typically developing; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000666339,0.0005362393,0.0005884281,0.001920906,0.000511574,0.001160126,0.0004771313,0.0009450242,0.002517933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007845575,0.0004461633,0.00027264,0.0004733485,0.002013663,0.001104137,0.001016605,0.0007927555,0.0002795087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006419542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001097155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004853648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002810496,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992925,0.0001621756,0.00007443346,0.0001159263,0.0002127061,0.0001421763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974217,0.001201374,0.0005208904,0.0001702751,0.0003216488,0.0003640709],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004437256,0.002182268,0.5034774,0.0003888574,0.0001677139,0.03831786,0.03239052,0.001832534,0.3350489,0.005363584,0.00151054,0.07488246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006171679,0.001238632,0.9592454,0.00004137558,0.00006031104,0.01236638,0.00754801,0.001107923,0.01543219,0.002179903,0.0006726608,0.00004553971],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992673,0.00005420086,0.0000554698,0.00002995523,0.000003563735,0.000004407964,0.00002967878,0.000009916178,0.0005454521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992755,0.0000829191,0.0001801234,0.000010262,0.000003080513,0.00001579927,0.00003967556,0.000007979657,0.0003846969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004853648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009650767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03577349783816709,"score_gpt":0.3673910928195661,"score_spread":0.331617594981399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}