{"id":"W2093435838","doi":"10.1007/s10198-014-0607-3","title":"Impact of small study bias on cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and value of information analyses","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The European Journal of Health Economics","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cost effectiveness; Econometrics; Bayesian probability; Internal validity; Value (mathematics); Value of information; Randomized controlled trial; External validity; Actuarial science; Economics; Statistics; Computer science; Medicine; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6936215,0.003703194,0.01182358,0.009092174,0.00156839,0.01046461,0.006645619,0.01051964,0.01070943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9200446,0.002692486,0.01976933,0.009260905,0.01101759,0.01276103,0.008677462,0.01131483,0.0009569246],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00465545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003298026,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002821923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001800336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1528791,0.7643061,0.04202957,0.01328889,0.02552303,0.001973302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0147832,0.9591154,0.008945093,0.01321187,0.003485489,0.0004588832],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05353089,0.0006123632,0.1031519,0.02690024,0.175008,0.003171469,0.00605472,0.05389431,0.002007093,0.1852964,0.02498433,0.3653883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01085047,0.005232872,0.04923962,0.009398467,0.1059498,0.004800998,0.001452144,0.1471545,0.0063787,0.6203102,0.03811187,0.0011204],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09101231,0.1178334,0.6984588,0.0339135,0.007944702,0.01077662,0.006182218,0.00205404,0.0318245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754045,0.004285174,0.09875511,0.01048705,0.001943327,0.005095008,0.001110275,0.0007729148,0.00214674],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3063785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3778192,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5397362363817703,"score_gpt":0.491491532844559,"score_spread":0.04824470353721128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}