{"id":"W2093459793","doi":"10.1063/1.1643534","title":"Nanoscopic electric potential probing: Influence of probe–sample interface on spatial resolution","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Physics Letters","topic":"Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Microstructural Sciences; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Voltage; Nanoscopic scale; Image resolution; Optoelectronics; Electric potential; Scanning probe microscopy; Sample (material); Nanometre; Heterojunction; Resolution (logic); Laser; Characterization (materials science); Nanotechnology; Optics; Electrical engineering; Physics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008651113,0.0002812259,0.0002851833,0.0002016126,0.0002576802,0.0008261269,0.0005356442,0.000612653,0.001331409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005058441,0.0004304982,0.0001049069,0.0002260442,0.0007842365,0.001238366,0.0005474261,0.0005984853,0.0002786073],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002765594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001809137,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002552932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003500498,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999513,0.00009494185,0.00002767005,0.0001241697,0.0001886047,0.00005154766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945282,0.004672702,0.0002309535,0.0002855496,0.000207168,0.0000754971],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001426544,0.00002071807,0.0005196271,0.0001018696,0.000006661469,0.0001121157,0.0001176207,0.0007988756,0.9882742,0.0008771264,0.00008775735,0.008940718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002047855,0.000130198,0.00218278,0.00001108579,0.00001194367,0.0003628858,0.00007689238,0.01714129,0.9783536,0.0007633719,0.0009330667,0.00001243151],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.906541,0.002777728,0.086035,0.000410333,0.00004399644,0.0000443202,0.0001403433,0.0004290291,0.003578289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721457,0.0009667692,0.02587014,0.0001041455,0.00002007469,0.0000456171,0.00007121408,0.00007866429,0.0006977853],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001331409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004575253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005468971986285166,"score_gpt":0.2322408117447864,"score_spread":0.2267718397585012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}