{"id":"W2093480451","doi":"10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.01.001","title":"Creeping flow around particles in a Bingham fluid","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics","topic":"Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies","field":"Chemical Engineering","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Context (archaeology); Limit (mathematics); Flow (mathematics); Stokes flow; Mathematics; Limiting; Viscoplasticity; Bingham plastic; Mechanics; Classical mechanics; Mathematical analysis; Physics; Geometry; Rheology; Engineering; Geology; Constitutive equation; Mechanical engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003226179,0.0003930248,0.0008059181,0.001437009,0.001706886,0.001657779,0.0007948989,0.001585765,0.001626733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002308346,0.0003880312,0.0003527186,0.0005529365,0.003064106,0.002043909,0.001248694,0.0008716807,0.0002270347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006774692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000549292,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003839072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001335985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998592,0.00002379099,0.000009524589,0.00003676035,0.00003656514,0.00003408529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993555,0.0002535452,0.00009893707,0.00005347929,0.00009345001,0.0001452476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00318427,0.001688333,0.02543153,0.0004895937,0.0002476192,0.01231585,0.003930752,0.3209209,0.4900039,0.1001798,0.004153547,0.0374539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002670999,0.0006835611,0.01564395,0.00002400932,0.0000417956,0.0007478945,0.0004822389,0.9423313,0.02266806,0.01563217,0.001364042,0.000113784],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894147,0.000323958,0.00707833,0.000347157,0.0001274537,0.00003754728,0.00002548006,0.00007398071,0.002571205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955868,0.00009685475,0.001855113,0.00007177748,0.0000574827,0.00001380661,0.00004262392,0.00002441466,0.002251183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003839072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007633448,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008723109371296622,"score_gpt":0.2325118896710782,"score_spread":0.2237887802997816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}