{"id":"W2093515585","doi":"10.1002/cjce.5450820318","title":"Computer Simulations of Adsorption Characteristics of Carbon Dioxide in Slit Graphite Pores","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","topic":"Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Capillary condensation; Adsorption; Graphite; Slit; Materials science; Perpendicular; Capillary action; Condensation; Monte Carlo method; Range (aeronautics); Carbon dioxide; Crystallography; Composite material; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Optics; Physical chemistry; Physics; Geometry; Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004219979,0.0003486453,0.0008547528,0.0005033562,0.0007738221,0.0006015744,0.0008745015,0.001218794,0.002121555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001547942,0.0004825893,0.0006420041,0.0008280646,0.0008230068,0.0004492155,0.0003842225,0.0005352158,0.0001558079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001450583,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02442199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01361993,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998289,0.00004857789,0.000004545985,0.00001702894,0.00004350082,0.00005738019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990612,0.0005826057,0.00005795553,0.00006627692,0.000151488,0.00008041549],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001044761,0.00005756448,0.001615741,0.00003201447,0.00003258742,0.00008961948,0.0000331423,0.9944299,0.001219108,0.001636893,0.0001525996,0.000596333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003263616,0.00004111854,0.0007280456,0.000003852831,0.000008044275,0.000008738426,0.00001750749,0.9982516,0.0004951006,0.0003043358,0.0001018534,0.000007233267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940918,0.00006920738,0.001944365,0.00009449392,0.000009315903,0.00001768074,0.0002203788,0.00006192909,0.003490835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997205,0.00006230316,0.001702448,0.00003932474,0.000004664651,0.00005783191,0.0002379072,0.00001930863,0.0006712126],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02442199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04855967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005184185642862691,"score_gpt":0.1749027180766479,"score_spread":0.1697185324337852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}