{"id":"W2093607456","doi":"10.1111/j.1936-4490.2002.tb00667.x","title":"A Contingency View of the Responses of Voluntary Social Service Organizations in Ontario to Government Cutbacks","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Restructuring; Government (linguistics); Accountability; Public relations; Contingency plan; Management; Business; Public administration; Business administration; Humanities; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001833692,0.0001198167,0.0003226413,0.0002966238,0.0007469812,0.0001073486,0.0008355551,0.00006153498,0.0004497588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001068084,0.0001161768,0.00007551481,0.002299838,0.001106351,0.0004245597,0.00002603742,0.000192236,0.000002774579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00133186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003645603,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1801935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877733,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983727,0.0001038381,0.0008476793,0.0001790839,0.0001069496,0.0003896925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984297,0.0001219014,0.0007588922,0.0001175316,0.000250763,0.0003212032],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001590298,0.00006878208,0.839389,0.00003273233,0.00002073473,0.00001615802,0.1290182,0.0001208004,0.0001774218,0.03045309,0.0001793574,0.0005079115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002272032,0.001197061,0.9698175,0.0002088819,0.00001222961,0.00007816108,0.01654781,0.0002423052,0.0004823973,0.00871223,0.00224431,0.0002299071],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872298,0.000170549,0.00006451578,0.003162507,0.0002303211,0.0001631685,0.0001078623,0.000001236481,0.008870033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981372,0.00001078921,0.001190734,0.0002335244,0.00002768455,0.000002414801,8.548965e-7,0.000004597478,0.0003922186],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8075799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8252657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1495185952966007,"score_gpt":0.2905026687319593,"score_spread":0.1409840734353586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}