{"id":"W2093796527","doi":"10.1353/rah.0.0142","title":"Reexamining America's Agricultural Development","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reviews in American History","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Government (linguistics); Index (typography); Acre; Livestock; Economic history; Agricultural economics; Political science; Economics; History; Agricultural science; Geography; Archaeology; Forestry; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004096844,0.0007081834,0.0003670762,0.002110469,0.003291401,0.006534951,0.0008000859,0.003517632,0.007080363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005706058,0.000256344,0.0004047037,0.002208909,0.005599975,0.005251667,0.004497989,0.006435473,0.001117202],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01306406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02282104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07327534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09368636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978974,0.0006445167,0.0001222034,0.0002082507,0.0006247794,0.0005028605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976151,0.0005714592,0.0001635698,0.00020021,0.001119906,0.0003298202],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002455909,0.00004690009,0.001533068,0.0004292966,0.00001873151,0.0002368088,0.004202724,0.0003060797,0.0007420248,0.4665853,0.3299759,0.1958986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002271665,0.000008595395,0.0006829255,0.0001350954,0.000002663745,0.00002498676,0.000505878,0.00002416593,0.0001001821,0.01163165,0.9868764,0.000005138745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01291454,0.1176531,0.005184209,0.5554597,0.01940446,0.0001159409,0.0006401931,0.0003764016,0.2882515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3407606,0.1718285,0.02772495,0.2356895,0.008527324,0.0004261701,0.001065232,0.0004529877,0.2135248],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07327534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1456977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01748848662975744,"score_gpt":0.2163321697090293,"score_spread":0.1988436830792719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}