{"id":"W2093879852","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.011","title":"Evaluating presentation formats of local climate change in community planning with regard to process and outcomes","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape and Urban Planning","topic":"Rural development and sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Process (computing); Climate change; Environmental planning; Computer science; Environmental resource management; Process management; Geography; Environmental science; Business; Ecology; Medicine; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03112845,0.0007584774,0.0005854819,0.002345941,0.001796623,0.005520161,0.001357506,0.001157569,0.009214784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1206975,0.0003433329,0.0009354799,0.001991811,0.001414209,0.003415398,0.003419376,0.001413034,0.0005488885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004180707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003087597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003145937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004528354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9694593,0.02423247,0.001031165,0.0006100385,0.00392866,0.0007383416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8751135,0.1059851,0.006265209,0.003492385,0.007018809,0.00212494],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007232792,0.008776636,0.04930035,0.008612633,0.0004166676,0.001215655,0.1703577,0.01554149,0.01198508,0.006031231,0.005824807,0.7147049],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005110841,0.05144335,0.2231349,0.01437776,0.002243905,0.001550617,0.4498819,0.02518496,0.04106152,0.01891467,0.1657183,0.001377334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582943,0.0009734755,0.0102219,0.001313858,0.0002580922,0.003047745,0.000318332,0.0003210127,0.02525136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708872,0.001080547,0.02178272,0.0002483904,0.0001190902,0.00308499,0.0002394269,0.00009606379,0.002461544],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03112845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1646249,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07637184740323422,"score_gpt":0.3366403872763912,"score_spread":0.260268539873157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}