{"id":"W2093980226","doi":"10.1177/00131640021971005","title":"Implications of Test Dimensionality for Unidimensional Irt Scoring: An Investigation of a High-Stakes Testing Program","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational and Psychological Measurement","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Item response theory; Psychology; Curse of dimensionality; Test (biology); Statistics; Psychometrics; Item analysis; Equating; Test validity; Homogeneous; Social psychology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Rasch model","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005544698,0.0001461046,0.0003147714,0.0001739741,0.0002017186,0.00003859474,0.0003367884,0.00008099141,0.0004149172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02571034,0.0001012107,0.00007165837,0.001018264,0.0002882096,0.0001323638,0.00002704477,0.00009658598,0.000003821946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002985895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001223645,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004625928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000361254,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969567,0.0002868476,0.0009214913,0.0005919157,0.001035613,0.0002074048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984076,0.01322261,0.0004364302,0.000423433,0.001654795,0.000186716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001206599,0.002337473,0.4820681,0.00002977075,0.000026435,1.040504e-7,0.0001862705,0.000177793,0.01624948,0.01931993,0.001847275,0.4776368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002509177,0.0007390978,0.7217013,0.00003186986,0.00001078082,0.00000645732,0.00005236245,0.00009603452,0.000321545,0.2763705,0.000333193,0.0000859018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937441,0.0002021197,0.000596708,0.003486033,0.0002092278,0.0005651184,0.00005493362,0.00002873192,0.001113052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8504468,0.000006118363,0.1490359,0.0001679182,0.0001113651,0.0001411633,0.0000185871,0.000005223329,0.00006696021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4775508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824965,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7984940592344482,"score_gpt":0.517856493671935,"score_spread":0.2806375655625132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}