{"id":"W2094005777","doi":"10.1016/j.jeoa.2014.03.002","title":"A taxonomy of the economic costs of family care to adults","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the Economics of Ageing","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Alberta","funders":"Employment and Social Development Canada","keywords":"Consistency (knowledge bases); Health care; Economic cost; Business; Cost–benefit analysis; Public economics; Economic evaluation; Actuarial science; Psychology; Economics; Economic growth; Political science; Computer science; Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00155997,0.00007533262,0.0002255759,0.00004910042,0.0001990877,0.0000188673,0.001059388,0.00004067189,0.000008404429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000166278,0.00004490234,0.0002415815,0.00005430506,0.0001594528,0.0001050442,0.0001580489,0.0001233691,0.000001335306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003084381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002977732,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001651313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004329402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989327,0.0002459722,0.000526079,0.00006128509,0.0001103159,0.0001237179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982522,0.0002864144,0.0009826402,0.0002533561,0.0001870366,0.00003842369],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004665141,0.00006888841,0.0152587,0.000113894,0.0004926331,5.931009e-7,0.07847595,0.6372515,0.01320698,0.2211972,0.002408658,0.03105849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067709,0.00214875,0.2694447,0.00742355,0.001214996,0.00005063066,0.4406751,0.08888515,0.06152311,0.03386313,0.08580492,0.00219509],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915742,0.0001023495,0.0001915015,0.0007557675,0.001011998,0.0001650798,0.00001477479,0.000001069063,0.006183306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992079,0.00009399212,0.0001838753,0.0001769518,0.0002523432,0.000001254536,1.597616e-7,0.000007953944,0.00007562037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5483663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2496302,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01120522099159163,"score_gpt":0.2349099547577451,"score_spread":0.2237047337661535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}