{"id":"W2094019681","doi":"10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040590f.4","title":"Risk assessment for LED lighting flicker","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Injury Prevention","topic":"Ocular and Laser Science Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Flicker; Risk assessment; LED lamp; Poison control; Medicine; Environmental health; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Electrical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01299115,0.0008888541,0.0006994482,0.006267683,0.0006547147,0.001881816,0.0009458061,0.001451884,0.002812144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02875051,0.0002549026,0.001792961,0.001528837,0.0006041425,0.001213035,0.001533621,0.0006309767,0.0003031664],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001676417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001794476,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003198615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003588584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9876283,0.005401616,0.0006916597,0.0004677692,0.005497571,0.0003130189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726362,0.01898193,0.00334056,0.0006299085,0.004254807,0.0001565561],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00177436,0.0005710237,0.1416947,0.006363978,0.001381861,0.002305289,0.002056423,0.358878,0.01288463,0.04542057,0.007570648,0.4190985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002478092,0.006204119,0.134446,0.004675522,0.003447451,0.006592788,0.006217974,0.5769187,0.03713348,0.1631379,0.06027974,0.0006985008],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3773442,0.01821653,0.5400069,0.002572325,0.0001747164,0.003540946,0.003152006,0.0006373129,0.05435517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914047,0.003745446,0.07802404,0.000185082,0.00005118856,0.0005509616,0.0008822439,0.00002838761,0.002485657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01299115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06870455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03059349859433877,"score_gpt":0.4237620307947105,"score_spread":0.3931685322003717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}