{"id":"W2094037547","doi":"10.1111/j.0008-4085.2006.00343.x","title":"A test of the Hotelling rule using old‐growth timber data","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Stumpage; Economics; Common value auction; Scarcity; Resource (disambiguation); Microeconomics; Econometrics; Construct (python library); Renewable resource; Contrast (vision); Natural resource economics; Environmental economics; Renewable energy; Computer science; Ecology; Agricultural economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02392691,0.0005191608,0.001379679,0.001516289,0.00135051,0.002688685,0.002521868,0.00132025,0.004879729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08929005,0.0003266157,0.001694149,0.002356381,0.002183431,0.002772589,0.001350049,0.002084311,0.0009836368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001306871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00165376,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01679998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007798241,"domain_scores_codex":[0.98728,0.007107652,0.0008966668,0.002201555,0.00164512,0.0008690396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7489876,0.2027688,0.02353056,0.01223942,0.009076684,0.003396988],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002866978,0.0008371799,0.8768821,0.0003207253,0.001566453,0.001505573,0.0008331883,0.04538384,0.001643514,0.03443924,0.008040415,0.02568072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009495959,0.002059867,0.3297375,0.0001213808,0.0005591834,0.0009028941,0.003521563,0.6110008,0.005308982,0.03971088,0.005887598,0.0002398428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889525,0.0001385329,0.006497892,0.0003597579,0.00005566561,0.00003819418,0.001040443,0.00007302028,0.002844081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972345,0.00002481257,0.001208587,0.00005692017,0.00002660305,0.0000133775,0.001219269,0.00001768991,0.0001982235],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1265391,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3032465132297276,"score_gpt":0.1795926004634855,"score_spread":0.1236539127662421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}