{"id":"W2094044308","doi":"10.1111/j.1541-0064.2008.00218.x","title":"Preservation of old‐growth forests: a case study of Big Timber Park, Whistler, BC","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; LOEWE Zentrum AdRIA","keywords":"Snag; Old-growth forest; Understory; Geography; Canopy; Ecology; Secondary forest; Natural (archaeology); Natural forest; Forest dynamics; Regeneration (biology); Vegetation (pathology); Forestry; Disturbance (geology); Agroforestry; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003377316,0.0002557951,0.0001948076,0.0006033861,0.007241674,0.0009743381,0.001075184,0.0005623261,0.001690866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008027684,0.0002281153,0.000111576,0.001688414,0.00166143,0.0004787027,0.0008586817,0.0007565953,0.0001237188],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01259914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008048347,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8617983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9806505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995459,0.00008432734,0.00001006726,0.00003509117,0.0001237146,0.0002010108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999453,0.00008553763,0.00005474596,0.00003258762,0.000125138,0.0002490371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003717497,0.0009176672,0.4661642,0.0005626207,0.0001032989,0.1085162,0.2408647,0.002375205,0.005711459,0.005418242,0.01113485,0.15786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002970735,0.0003000429,0.5573499,0.0002484566,0.00005054664,0.01328749,0.3644065,0.00175568,0.001509445,0.0008368411,0.06016205,0.00006325197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929677,0.0003824997,0.0001715239,0.0002929992,0.000007334315,0.00005273852,0.00009681956,0.000004937343,0.006023382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933791,0.0007150309,0.0006300487,0.0001394467,0.000005314282,0.00002153929,0.0001092503,0.000007699813,0.004992513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1382017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2780311,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01389894981635442,"score_gpt":0.2000471252835446,"score_spread":0.1861481754671902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}