{"id":"W2094057006","doi":"10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.165","title":"Auditors' Strategies to Protect Their Litigation Reputation: A Research Note","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; Audit; Business; Litigation risk analysis; Accounting; Damages; Law; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01938579,0.0002553167,0.0003151701,0.0006250714,0.0006688582,0.001222721,0.0005052447,0.00009244612,0.0003193443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2031876,0.0002304055,0.0001384055,0.001330637,0.0001291294,0.006126009,0.0001849141,0.001199283,0.0004665111],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002123729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002909882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006396455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001031828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962544,0.0007506573,0.0008195911,0.0003685527,0.001230471,0.000576324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745569,0.002573935,0.02003004,0.0003671052,0.002419906,0.00005211906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007987845,0.0003725097,0.0004283334,0.0004390985,0.0003461638,0.0004605062,0.006970859,0.007944562,0.006773056,0.6792691,0.02074649,0.2754506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006707423,0.0001598253,0.00124693,0.000625576,0.000122596,0.0001319408,0.01830582,0.00009681967,0.0008800832,0.1276716,0.8497269,0.0003611296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1596036,0.0003160657,0.7058714,0.01049656,0.001675635,0.0009002176,0.000002148614,0.0001452714,0.1209891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875154,0.00002740348,0.005682561,0.001722544,0.004339249,0.00003223079,0.000002048535,0.000064433,0.0006140732],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8289804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02404220773303024,"score_gpt":0.3152890745340514,"score_spread":0.2912468668010211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}