{"id":"W2094069497","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12079","title":"‘More than skin‐deep’: Biological essentialism in response to a distinctiveness threat in a stigmatized fan community","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Essentialism; Psychology; Social psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Outgroup; Affect (linguistics); Sociology; Gender studies; Communication","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005829598,0.0001671085,0.0007055235,0.0003156929,0.0005639172,0.00007872401,0.0008282025,0.0004959492,0.0001980806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002565674,0.000189103,0.0002167513,0.0007689013,0.0009832606,0.0001717164,0.00009351058,0.001134422,0.00002183024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002257361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008728635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005908095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02936432,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9895942,0.008473979,0.000792638,0.0002504141,0.000307466,0.0005813659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982736,0.0008174781,0.0003675041,0.0001342207,0.0002143642,0.0001927948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.02152148,0.005883713,0.1947539,0.00003978127,0.0002228821,0.001569887,0.4037197,0.00000839013,0.01292467,0.01633561,0.01120067,0.3318194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002701069,0.0004079025,0.9526936,0.00009963989,0.0000075216,0.0001326566,0.01488171,6.776245e-7,0.000005469731,0.01886828,0.009995406,0.0002060566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821047,0.00009587459,0.0009048186,0.009354369,0.001211485,0.000242003,0.00001031811,0.00002220212,0.006054194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968865,0.00009803531,0.0001735499,0.001949549,0.0007804614,0.00002113556,0.000003463702,0.00001701111,0.00007028485],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7579398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9883472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04281651974706219,"score_gpt":0.3983452726676965,"score_spread":0.3555287529206343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}