{"id":"W2094076203","doi":"10.7202/042871ar","title":"L'idée de droit naturel à la lumière de la sociologie juridique de Max Weber","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Positivism; Rationality; Natural law; Legal positivism; Natural order; Sociology; Sociology of law; Epistemology; Opposition (politics); Positive law; Value (mathematics); Law; Relation (database); Human science; Antinomy; Philosophy; Comparative law; Private law; Political science; Philosophy of law; Social science; Politics; Black letter law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003198531,0.0006338058,0.0005386337,0.002096788,0.00373202,0.007936962,0.0006653502,0.003027599,0.005056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004487909,0.0002675438,0.0003244909,0.001728516,0.01999811,0.00933153,0.002054428,0.004951107,0.001111204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005592369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003251017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006511761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00358253,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973144,0.001550651,0.00006193457,0.0003138651,0.000616093,0.0001430135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980187,0.001403495,0.000173018,0.0001256911,0.0001830138,0.00009606604],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002538939,0.000003198428,0.00002852009,0.00001485778,7.645558e-7,0.00001044111,0.0005235363,0.00004120541,0.00002514845,0.990386,0.005579247,0.003384644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005884695,0.000005720639,0.0001431931,0.0001008381,0.000001727751,0.00005626154,0.0003765214,0.0002340096,0.00008620827,0.5602233,0.4387568,0.000009488893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109915,0.1473901,0.02870191,0.2124732,0.007103381,0.00003757199,0.0001408765,0.0001495454,0.5930119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.623236,0.0885625,0.01458248,0.03144114,0.01662385,0.0003545016,0.000118742,0.0002808645,0.2247999],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007936962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04057574,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008949589355097718,"score_gpt":0.2923312879093787,"score_spread":0.283381698554281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}